GM Asks The $3 Billion Question

Written By Thomas Ponco on Saturday, August 27, 2011 | 4:33 AM

The first Sports Cars are considered to be (though the term would not be coined until after World War One) the 3 litre made in 1910 Vauxhall 20 hp (15 kW) and 27/80PS Austro-Daimler (designed by Ferdinand Porsche).

<object width="450" height="367" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase=",0,40,0">><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">/></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always">/></param><param name="src" value=";hl=en_US">/></param><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true">/></param><embed width="450" height="367" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src=";hl=en_US" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true">/></embed></object>

GM spent $4.26 billion for advertising last year, globally. 67 percent, or $2.85 billion were spent in  the U.S.  A good chunk of this budget, around $3 billion, are up for review. Meaning: The agencies that handle it must come up with concepts and defend theirs against concepts of other agencies that want to handle the funds. Please note that this has nothing to do with creative ideas, or not in the true sense of it. We are talking media buying here, buying time on network, space in magazines, clicks on Google. It should be as interesting as deciding whether your accounting work will be done by Peat Marwick or by KPMG. (Loud howls of protest from the media agencies, who are as proud of the cleverness of their media plans as the CPA firms are pleased with their creative accounting.)

The adworld is abuzz about the move, $3 billion possibly changing to new handlers can shake up carefully cultivated relationships. The question everybody is asking: “Why?”

The answer most people are giving: “Money.”

After all, what else can a media buying agency bring to the table than a few more gross rating points for a few dollars less? It could also be that GM simply wants to reduce its ad spend, something that can be obscured while changing media agencies.

Former Chrysler marketing executive Julie Roehm, now a consultant, has different other suspicions. She is quoted by Automotive News [sub] as saying: “I don’t think it’s about cost cutting. It’s smoke and mirrors to hide bigger problems.”

She points towards Omnicom’s Goodby, Silverstein & Partners, an agency that was brought in by   Chief Marketing Officer Joel Ewanick withouth a review. That agency has come under criticism for turning in unremarkable work, their “Chevy runs deep” slogan fails to resonate. Their godfather Ewanick recently tried to deflect criticism by giving Goodby Silverstein “B and C work” grades. That only lasts so long. Nothing however focuses the attention of upper management as much away as the decision of who will spend their $ 3 billion in the future.

List of sports cars GM Asks The $3 Billion Question A car may be a sporting automobile without being a sports car. New sports cars GM Asks The $3 Billion Question Performance modifications of regular, production cars, such as sport compacts, sports sedans, muscle cars, hot hatches and the like, generally are not considered sports cars, yet share traits common to sports cars. They are sometimes called " Affordable Sports Cars GM Asks The $3 Billion Question" for marketing purposes for increased advertising and promotional purposes. Performance cars of all configurations are grouped as Sports and Grand tourer cars or, occasionally, as performance Cheap Sports Cars GM Asks The $3 Billion Question.

You are now Read GM Asks The $3 Billion Question And The Link for this article is
Enjoy The Article GM Asks The $3 Billion Question.